Know someone who needs this? Forward it. Did someone send this to you? Subscribe here
A founder I spoke with recently navigated a merger. It went well — but the insight she left me with had nothing to do with the merger itself.
She said: before you're ever in a high-stakes conversation, find out how your board thinks about big, risky change.
Most leaders don't do this, because there's always something more urgent. And boards, on the surface, seem fine — they show up, they vote, they stay out of your way.
But the first time you test risk appetite shouldn't be when you're asking your board to approve the most consequential decision your organization has faced in years.
Understanding your board's risk appetite tells you who will expand their thinking with the right exposure and conversations, and who has reached the ceiling of what they're willing to hold.
One is a development opportunity.
The other is a succession conversation you should have before you need to have it.
This is what it means to actively shape your board for the future you want, rather than inheriting the board you have: It means being deliberate about what perspectives sit around the table, what experiences board members are exposed to, and what conversations happen long before a decision is on the agenda.
The simple version of doing this: once a year, ask your board (individually, not in a group):
"How do you think about risk when it comes to this organization?"
What you learn will tell you what work you need to do before your next big move.
When it matters most, your board should be an asset you've deliberately built, not a variable you're navigating.
What would make you most likely to forward this email?
